Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Absolutely perfect mock
#7
(03-01-2019, 03:25 PM)ochocincos Wrote: There shouldn't really be an issue with going non-QB BPA at 11 since there should be a way to get any of the following positions worthwhile playing time:
- LB (obvious)
- OL (obvious)
- TE (obvious)
- DT (nickel DT at least)
- DE (typical rotation snaps)
- CB (nickel CB at least)

If the team were to go QB or WR, you'd have to expect either a trade coming soon after the draft or just keeping the incumbent through 2019 as a stopgap while the rookie gets up to speed.

I agree with your post. To me it seems 1st rd is easy to get players that should get playing time. (As I typed that, I thought, except our last 3 or 4 lmao) I'm thinking our day 2 picks. If we can get them alot of playing time or even starting, it's a very successful draft
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Absolutely perfect mock - Jpoore - 02-28-2019, 12:56 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - ochocincos - 03-01-2019, 10:55 AM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - sandwedge - 03-01-2019, 12:45 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - sandwedge - 03-01-2019, 03:20 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - ochocincos - 03-01-2019, 03:25 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - sandwedge - 03-01-2019, 03:36 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - fortyyearfan - 03-03-2019, 08:55 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - Jpoore - 03-02-2019, 01:42 AM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - corpjet - 03-03-2019, 07:22 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - BengalChris - 03-04-2019, 12:01 AM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - Jpoore - 03-04-2019, 10:52 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - SHRacerX - 03-06-2019, 10:27 AM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - 3wt - 03-06-2019, 11:12 AM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - McC - 03-06-2019, 03:07 PM
RE: Absolutely perfect mock - 3wt - 03-06-2019, 03:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)