03-14-2019, 04:52 PM
(03-14-2019, 04:40 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No they would not. The Rams would 100% agree that there are lots of teams that don't sign big name free agents and get better while there are also teams that sign big name free agents that don't get better.
If you want to play this game for every team you list that signed big name free agents and got better I can list a team that did not sign big name free agents and still got better or else a team that signed big name free agents and did not get better.
Acquiring talent makes you better. The Bengals are PASSIVE in acquiring the best talent that they can in free agency every year. It's nothing new...that's how they have approached free agency as far back as I can remember.
To sit here and say that acquiring good players in free agency (or big names as you like to call them) doesn't make your team better is completely asinine.
The Rams used free agency to sign quality guys to supplement an already quality team...like many winning teams do in the NFL. They added pieces to their puzzle. The Bengals added Bobby Hart and Preston Brown. You tell me how this ends up...
The boys are just talkin' ball, babyyyy