03-14-2019, 04:55 PM
(03-14-2019, 04:46 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No it does not.
There are teams that eventually get better after being losers for a long time, but that does not mean losing made then better.
But if you want to argue the point then tell me how much losing is needed to make a winner? Bengals once went 14 years without a winning record. How much did losing 13 games in 1991 contribute to us finally having a winning season in '05?
The Bengals being awful and going 2-14 and drafting Carson Palmer with the first pick in 2003 had 100% to do with their 2005 winning season.
Next...
The boys are just talkin' ball, babyyyy