09-27-2015, 06:20 PM
(09-27-2015, 06:14 PM)McC Wrote: It just seems so vague that officials can do whatever they want with the play. What about making a football move and breaking the plane? when he extended the ball, he was no longer a receiver. He was a runner. When the runner breaks the plane, TD.
(09-27-2015, 06:15 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: And that is the point of the rule. If it's secured, it won't come out.
(09-27-2015, 06:17 PM)Fresno B Wrote: Don't you think that's kinda weak comparing a drop and almost interception vs an actual interception ( in the red zone) and actual fumble? Dalton played a hell of a ball game and deserves a game ball too, but that's a weak excuse.
(09-27-2015, 06:17 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: It would have been ruled incomplete at the 50 as well. If you don't take it through to the ground, it's not a catch.
Doesn't take Encyclopedia Brown to solve the case.
(09-27-2015, 06:17 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: So you're saying that he ALMOST made a costly mistake, rather than he DID make two costly ones?
RE the fumble:
That is why it's a stupid rule. It's vague. It has no real meaning. It can be applied at any given point in time in any way.
As to the AJ play:
Just saying people don't give a shit that AJ made bad plays. They give a shit that Andy made bad plays.
Basing it on the luck of Baltimore being able to finish the play is silly.
