Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What position can we NOT expect at 11
#10
(04-08-2019, 02:11 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: If we stay at #11, I think you can safely rule out the following:

1.  RB
2.  C
3.  S
4.  CB
5.  OG
6.  WR

I'm not saying that those positions aren't needs, but I just can't see the Bengals drafting any of these because:

1.  There isn't a player at a position that grades high enough to justify the pick (RB, C, S, CB)
2.  The team doesn't value a position at that spot (OG)
3.  There just isn't a big enough need (WR)
Massive adderly justifies the #11 pick. Top 5 on my
Board.
(04-09-2019, 10:14 AM)shanebo Wrote: In order:
- LS, P, K are def out.
- RB, S are out because no one is worth the 11th pick, plus we don't pick safeties that high.
- OG, C are out because no one is worth the 11th pick, and we don't pick interior OL that high. If they're targeting one, they will likely trade back.

After that, it get dicey ...
- WR, TE - Possible, but doubtful. Even though Mikey B loves to pick offensive skill positions high, I don't think he goes WR because none are phenomenal talents (apologies to DK). And I don't think he sees the TE position as a difference maker, especially after being burned with Gresham and Eifert.
- QB - Also doubtful. I think they roll with AD to see how he works in the new system.

So I think we go LB, OT, or D-line at 11, with CB being the dark horse (need depth and/or third starter if/when Dennard leaves next year ...)

Adderly is worth the #11 pick
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: What position can we NOT expect at 11 - Jpoore - 04-10-2019, 09:04 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)