Starting to Think We Go QB Early

[Essex Johnson]

(04-18-2019, 02:11 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: All fair points. I can see plenty of reasons either way. On the pro side of taking a QB, it'd generate more fan interest, it's a new regime which often = new QB, and taking a QB now would allow for that new QB to sit and learn behind Andy for a year, after which we could trade Andy.

A QB at 11 would still be a mild surprise. I'd be less surprised about one in round 2 and I'm pretty much expecting a QB somewhere in the top 4 rounds.

I really don;t buy the  generate interest in fans.. how many times did the Browns do that... how about Tampa Bay now or Arizona last year.. 

Just like a new coach.. you need to win, if a coach feels they have a better chance in winning with the new QB then yes.. if they are making decisions on what fans like.. i doubt they last anyway... as for learning behind Andy you helped support my point, they have Andy for two years, they can draft next year and do that...  and it is a projected better draft then this year.  Don;t you think it is interesting that before all the draft day workouts etc.. it was said probably 4 QB going in top 12... now looking like 1 or 2.. QBs are falling down in the draft because of too many questions..