04-24-2019, 12:11 PM
(04-24-2019, 12:02 PM)Okeana Wrote: Baker, I don't feel is a great scheme fit, but ultimately he made the board and I think he's a good player. Dillard, I just don't like regardless of what draft pundits say. I would rather have Risner any day of the week than Dillard.
I think Winovich is more athletic than Sam Hubbard and other than being white they aren't very similar at all. Sam Hubbard ran a 4.89 while Chase ran a 4.51. Sam is almost 6'6 while Chase is 6'3. Sam doesn't have bend while Chase has better pass rushing skills and decent bend. Athletically Chase could play OLB in the NFL while Sam is more of a LDE. I'm actually really surprised you would compare these two on any level.
I'm a Fan of Harry, but with he doesn't offer much in the way of improvement for the team as a slot receiver which is what I view him as which is why I didn't have him on the list.
Ferg would be on my list if it was longer along with Joe Jackson
I agree, I like Risner above all. His tape against Sweat was really good and he showed all year he is a stud.
They both rely on motor to win, I'm not even looking at measurables. The tape is full of them being relentless and not neccessarily winning with superior technique but not giving up on plays. A lot of run downs from behind and a lot of sacks because they keep coming. I think both could stand up in the NFL, but I don't think either is a star in the NFL just solid 10 year players.
Harry is an outside receiver, not a slot. To me he is Dez Bryant, a deep ball specialist who is going to make his living on contested jump balls not really on explosive route running. I look at him as AJ insurance, he isn't AJ, but he can full fill the contested jump ball role in the event AJ leaves or continues to be injured. In my mind it allows us to more readily move Boyd into the slot on 3 wide sets, but let Boyd continue to be outside on two receiver sets early on.
