Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
We're still not in good shape at LB. Any ideas?
(05-01-2019, 04:22 PM)Whodey614 Wrote: You got me there. What I mean by "didn't mind the FA" is that some of the signings made sense. We didn't get to see the best of Preston Brown yet and losing him would've been a big blow to an already terrible position group. BW Webb as the 4th corner is fine but we would've had problems if he were our 3rd CB like we originally expected. Luckily the market on DD was dry so he came back. I definitely agree we should've let Eifert go especially if it looks like Sample is the new system TE for Taylor's offense.

What didn't make sense was that they didn't do more than that and they definitely had the money to. Unless they just plan on turning over the roster within the next couple of years so they don't really care about this season. But like we said a few pages back that means you completely wasted the primes of some really good players.

I think I'm there with most of that.

I'm ok with Brown. I would have also added LJ Fort. He signed so cheap with the Eagles. Even if he ended up being our 4th LB...Wow. Or you start him until Pratt develops.

Then, instead of Miller and Hart and Webb...I would have signed Saffold and Andre Smith. Miller has been in and out of the Rams starting lineup.

Williams/Saffold/Price/Boling/Glenn is a Top 10/12 offensive line. Then the backups would be Smith at the Tackle spots/Redmond/Hopkins. We may have even been able to sign Hart for a few million.

By not signing quality outside starters, it puts so much pressure on the draft and coaching.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: We're still not in good shape at LB. Any ideas? - THE PISTONS - 05-01-2019, 09:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)