Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In 1992, IF the Bengals hired 2004 Marvin Lewis instead of Dave Shula...
#11
(06-11-2019, 12:40 PM)NKURyan Wrote: Pointing out that Marvin is a flawed coach is not the same as pointing out that Marvin is a bad coach. I think the vast majority of fans appreciate what he did in his time here, but there was no question that it was time for him to go.

How long is the Marvin Lewis white knighting going to continue on the boards? Some of y'all act like he was completely without fault in everything that happened over the last few years here and will jump through every hoop you can find to defend the guy... and these are the same people who will blast other fans for "settling for mediocrity"!

No doubt Marvin needed to be gone...probably 5 years ago.

But, back to the premise of the thread: He did come in and restore a team to atleast average from bad. IF he were here since 1992, would he have had success in the 90's or would the team have still been bad?
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: In 1992, IF the Bengals hired 2004 Marvin Lewis instead of Dave Shula... - THE PISTONS - 06-11-2019, 01:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)