09-30-2015, 03:24 PM
(09-30-2015, 02:11 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: And you actually think that they should even be close to each other? Lol Ok. I guess football isn't about scoring points and it's about who is more efficient. One QB has 1700 more yards 8 more TDs and 2 less INTs and only 1% less completion percentage, and he has a lower passer rating. Anyone who is shown those two stat lines and picks QB1 as a better QB has lost their minds.
Efficientcy does not = who's better. Passer rating = efficiency.
Because he had to throw the ball a billion more times. Volume passer =/= who's better. Who gets the most out of what they do = who's better. I.E., efficiency.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."