07-03-2019, 04:03 PM
(07-03-2019, 01:25 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Not sure what is going on here.
I was trying to explain why the Bengals would not say that Boling was done, and my example was the Bengals not saying that Palmer was done in '08.
So you are agreeing with me, right?
I asked if the team ever indicated the extent of Carson's injury and your source indicated they didn't.
If ESPN's sources' were accurate that doesn't explain the Bengals' secrecy once they knew the the extent of the diagnosis and the prognosis.
The same applies to Boling. If the fans and other teams knew Boling's diagnosis and prognosis today how would that negatively affect the Bengals? He's still under contract, the Bengals have stocked up OGs, and opening day is two months away, right? If he's able to play they're going to go with what the got. If he isn't able to play, they're gonna go with what they got. They're not giving away any competitive advantage by letting the fans know what is going on.
