09-04-2019, 12:23 PM
(09-04-2019, 11:53 AM)bengalfan74 Wrote: I'll fill you in.
Not playing soft zone defense all the time. More man to man, bump and run, tight coverage in the secondary.
Blitzing more. We've had some of the lowest blitz numbers in the NFL lately.
Stunting D linemen and LBers run blitzing off that.
Sending CB's and S's off the edge on blitzes from time to time. Stop just sitting and waiting on whatever they dish out.
It has nothing to do with effort on a given play or game.
Got it ?
"soft zone" in the biggest cliche that gets posted here. It's an ignorant statement. It acts as if teams in the NFL don't pattern match but instead stand around covering grass. Zone gives players the ability to play with their eyes on the QB and make breaks on balls. Heck, Wade Phillips match up zone defense has been used by multiple super bowl teams in the last 5 or 6 years.
We blitzed 22nd most of any team in the NFL last year, and when we did we were the 32nd rated team in getting pressure doing it. It wasn't a matter of being "soft" it's matter of being ineffective and when you are ineffective and leave your defense on islands you get torched as we did. With that said the Bears, Chargers, Eagles, Rams, Colts all blitzed LESS then us last year and were much better defenses. Apparently being "Soft" works for them.
I get this is a message board for fans, but the amount of things that get thrown out around here that have little to no base in actual football reality is mind boggling at times.