09-07-2019, 05:37 PM
(09-07-2019, 05:27 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Your opinion, I disagree.
HOF QB's are there because they were great for their entire careers. The guys I mentioned got in the HOF in spite of no rings, unlike guys like Bradshaw who never get in if they lose those games.
I’d rather use championships than the HOF (for the most part ) when gauging a career. There’s plenty of guys I don’t agree with being in or out of the HOF, but rings are undebatable. For me, there’s probably a reason guys like TO and Moss (and AB so far) always came up short. Even my favorite player of all time in Chad had the problem of not focusing solely on football all the time. And could be accused of being a distraction. Although his shenanigans were mostly in good fun compared to most other “diva” WRs.