Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Did the Bengals re-sign Gio so that they could trade him?
#9
(10-07-2019, 10:23 AM)WeezyBengal Wrote: It's the only thing I can think of that makes re-signing him make any sense. He's gotten like 5 touches over the last 2 games.

If you think about it - it's actually not a bad move by the Bengals (if they actually plan on trading him). Lock up a player who was going to be a FA to a muli year team friendly deal and then flip him at the deadline (more value because more team controllable years).

If this isn't the case - then man, what a backwards move by the Bengals.

He's the replacement for Ryan Hewitt.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Did the Bengals re-sign Gio so that they could trade him? - TJHoushmandzadeh's Shiny Shoes - 10-07-2019, 11:06 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)