Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Did the Bengals re-sign Gio so that they could trade him?
#16
(10-07-2019, 04:12 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Gio has 70 combined yards in the the last games. The extension makes no sense, IMO, if this is how he'll continue to be used...which is pretty much how he was used last year as well. Just far too much money for such little usage / production.

Yup.. Maybe if Taylor would have said he plans on implementing a Saints or an Eagles offense from few years back, instead of the Rams, then the Gio deal would make more sense. 

Basically they paid for a nice Corvette to be used in a demolition derby.
“Don't give up. Don't ever give up.” - Jimmy V

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Did the Bengals re-sign Gio so that they could trade him? - Millhouse - 10-07-2019, 04:26 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)