Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Glenn versus Bennett??
#16
(10-24-2019, 08:37 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Patriots would have kept him around if they needed him like we need Glenn.  They just traded him because they did not need him anymore.

We don't need him. We're 0-7, most likely soon to be 0-8. And he's still not back. We have nothing left to play for of note, other than pride and development.


How many games does adding Glenn win this team, if any at all? 0, 1, 2...?   Is he a long term answer? Is he here even next season? Does he help or hurt the culture Taylor is trying build here?

What exactly do you gain by having him on this roster? Maybe a win or two (doubtful)? And at what cost?

The cost is 1.) Lost compensation (draft pick) 2.) Development and gained experience of younger players. Players who will actually play a roll here in a rebuild beyond this season. And 3.) The potential for distraction/poisoning of the locker-room, a locker-room that already is extremely fragile given their performance thus far.

To each their, I see no value whatsoever in him. I sse the exact opposite. Take whatever you can get, if anything, and move on. NOW. Give those reps to some young guys and worry strickly about development and building for the future. He's a cancer that needs to be removed before the behavior spreads or taints anyone else.

As with many things surrounding this team, I'm often left with this question: What message are you sending? What message are you sending by allowing this clown to stay? To your players, coaches, to your fans... What message are you sending here?

Ex: What message are you sending by not having having the same competitive advantages and luxuries as your peers? (Indoor facility, scouting department, free agency activity)

It sends a bad message, and IMHO gives the impression your standards are not as high as your peers. By putting up with this, by allowing this, it's just another brick in the wall of lowered standards.

An example needs to be made. And that's without considering the rebuilding benefits. If he stays I just don't see a single thing to be gained. Only negatives and only the idea that of them having a culture and standards that are so much less than.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Glenn versus Bennett?? - Luvnit2 - 10-24-2019, 08:10 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - fredtoast - 10-24-2019, 08:37 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - Luvnit2 - 10-24-2019, 10:40 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - Wes Mantooth - 10-24-2019, 11:00 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - grampahol - 10-24-2019, 08:43 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - bfine32 - 10-24-2019, 08:45 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - grampahol - 10-24-2019, 09:11 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - Nicomo Cosca - 10-24-2019, 09:52 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - RASCAL - 10-24-2019, 10:34 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - lone bengal - 10-24-2019, 09:18 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - THE PISTONS - 10-24-2019, 09:45 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - ochocincos - 10-25-2019, 10:13 AM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - jason - 10-24-2019, 09:58 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - Nicomo Cosca - 10-24-2019, 10:00 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - J24 - 10-24-2019, 11:05 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - Nicomo Cosca - 10-25-2019, 12:26 AM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - NATI BENGALS - 10-24-2019, 10:37 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - Atomic Orange - 10-24-2019, 10:44 PM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - sonofstat - 10-25-2019, 07:12 AM
RE: Glenn versus Bennett?? - Au165 - 10-25-2019, 08:23 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)