10-25-2019, 01:41 PM
(10-25-2019, 12:41 PM)lone bengal Wrote: Far as I know he is cleared to play and they probably have to give a reason as to why he isn’t playing ? He missed meetings prior to the Pittsburgh game even if he is injured he can still attend meetings. Dave Lapman was on the radio with Lance McAlister a few days ago and basically hinted that Glenn just dosent want to play. He said there were concerns when they traded for him in Buffalo about his desire to play. He also said there was something wrong with Glenn’s eye and Glenn is saying it was a from the concussion and the Bengals and doctors said there’s nothing wrong or it didn’t happen from the concussion. Definitely more stuff going on behind the scenes we don’t know about.
If a player is cleared of the concussion protocol that means the concussion is resolved and they are no longer injured. The Bengals shouldn't list a player on the injury report if he is no longer injured and cleared to play in a game. If he refuses to play that's different than being injured. If he refuses to play after being cleared they should suspend and fine him like they did last week. But, this week he is on the injury list again for a concussion he should no longer be suffering from since he has been cleared of the concussion protocol and was limited in practice even though he should be a full participant if he has been cleared. Again, if he has been cleared then he shouldn't be on the injury list and he shouldn't be listed as limited practice.
But, I wanted pally's input on this if possible.
