11-04-2019, 09:14 PM
(11-04-2019, 08:18 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I've done 0 to defend the front office other than to expose a lie spewed by a disgruntled former employee. The Carson era is probably why we're not as active as "signing a player here and there" now as we were during his tenure.
Writes the disgruntled fan spewing the false narrative Carson demanded a trade because fans were mean to his wife and wanted to live on the West Coast.
They live in Idaho. Now I realize English is a second language in Kentucky and I’m not familiar with the maps Kentucky schools use to teach geography, but Idaho is not on the West Coast.
I can think of four free agents off the top of my head: they re-signed Bobby Hart and Preston Brown and signed B.W. Webb and John Miller all key ingredients to this year’s success. Seems like they signed a player here or there and stating otherwise would be a lie if we’re going to be completely literal. Or we could agree what they did amounted to nothing and essentially nothing changed. So which one are you going to choose? Or are you going to continue to vacillate between the two as it suits you? I bet on the latter.
