11-10-2019, 11:11 PM
(11-10-2019, 10:30 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Shula had 5 wins and another 5 games we lost by 7 or less. (I know you Taylor supporters count close losses as wins.)
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>Zac Taylor must go 5-2 the rest of the way to match David Shula's first season with #Bengals
— Lance McAlister (@LanceMcAlister) November 11, 2019
Shula won 5 games in his first year. Tom Landry won zero. So what does either of those things prove? If Zac wins less than Shula, but more than Landry, does that mean Shula was better than Landry? I get confused by the math.
Seriously though, I have no idea what to make of Zac at this point and have been disappointed with a lot of what I've seen so far.