11-15-2019, 04:40 PM
(11-15-2019, 01:50 PM)Catmandude123 Wrote: Really don't care what you or any other Squealers fan think of me. Everyone knows your team and your fan base are the biggest offenders and cry babies when it comes to dirty play. Keep crying it does the rest of the league good to see you suffer.
It's not just Steelers fans who think you're a clueless immature punk.
(11-15-2019, 02:04 PM)Catmandude123 Wrote: Two on one = all is fair. If this went to court Garrett would be justified by self defense and Rudolph would be charged and convicted. Garrett was backing away and Rudolph lunged repeatedly at him. The helmet was an equalizer. FREE GARRETT!!!!!!
You've got to be in your early 20's at the most. Your understanding of the criminal justice system displays all the knowledge and sophistication of a preschooler. Not to mention if this occurred in a street scenario then Garrett would be arrested for assault with a deadly weapon, 245(a)(1) PC in CA, which carries a very significant amount of prison time.
(11-15-2019, 02:10 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: after watching the incident
The leagues suspension without pay is the right call... Pouncy as well for kicking garrett on the head after should be suspended.. Nothing Rudolph did was worth more than a fine.
Logical as always, good sir.
(11-15-2019, 02:37 PM)jason Wrote: Well Rudolph didn't get fined... Because nothing he did crossed any lines. Everything about that incident was normal, and occurs in several games a year, if not weekly. Swingin' a man's helmet at his exposed head was where things got out of line. I've already said it... Mason Rudolph could have been killed , or his life forever changed by that. Nothing leading up to that act matters.
Well stated. The incident could have very easily caused serious injury.
(11-15-2019, 02:49 PM)6andcounting Wrote: It's something a ******** 3 years old would say to excuse themselves, but better yet it's not even true. It was started with Garrett's late hit and unnecessarily pulling Rudolph to the ground.
Absolutely. I don't always like Stephen A. Smith, but he totally eviscerated his cohost's assertion that Rudolph was in any way to blame for this incident. People trying to blame anyone but Garrett have a very poor understanding of the concept of personal responsibility.
(11-15-2019, 02:59 PM)Millhouse Wrote: IF anything, Rudolph should see a minor fine, nothing more though (again IF anything). After watching entire play a few times, it looked like he was pissed he was tackled the way he was after he threw the ball, plus it was a meaningless last play of the game. Who wouldn't get po'd for that?
The other suspensions and fines, mainly Garret's, is what should happen.
Also well stated!
