11-17-2019, 04:28 PM
(11-17-2019, 04:13 PM)fredtoast Wrote: This is a very stupid idea. If we had young guys who were playing well then it would be fine to get rid of the old guys.
But when ALL THE PLAYERS are doing poorly it is the coaches instead of the players.
Do any of you realize how long it would take to re-create a entire 53 man roster?
Where did anyone say anything about replacing an entire 53 man roster?
How long should they run the same roster out there before they decide that these players are finished?
This team has won zero games this year. The roster as it is constructed is really bad, despite the protests of the Front Office Avengers. The big money veterans on defense have failed to get things together under two separate coordinators. What exactly is keeping the once terrific players doing for us? What would happen with younger, worse ones? Would we lose more games? The answer is no, because that isn't possible.
Who should we fire on staff? Name some names. Taylor? Turner? Lou? I seem to recall you saying that they should get a second shot regardless of the results this season.
I don't get how you can come on here and argue that there's nothing about this staff or roster that warrants personnel change. You must just want to argue or something.
They tried to tell us that it was just the coaches when they sucked last year. Coaching changes plus the same roster would bring the "New Dey", lol. How's that going? Maybe they should try to get some better players this time, you think?
