Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who else was conflicted during this game?
#47
(12-09-2019, 10:25 AM)TJHoushmandzadeh Wrote: This has been bugging me for a while but what does 1OA actually stand for - 1st overall? The A seems superfluous.


I'm less sanguine about next year's prospects but when I see a pessimist like yourself saying they may only need 6 players when they should be selecting at 1, 33 and 65 in the draft that should be three new starters - add in last year's 11th overall and that's four already and if they trade Dalton they could maybe pick up an extra starter (either player for player or for a draft pick) and then even a pessimist like yourself reckons we could be competitive with one further player and I'm forced to question whether I need to raise my expectations for next year.

How many quality starters did we get from this past draft?

Theoretically, picking at 1, 33, and 65 should be atleast 2 upgrades. But, I doubt that it is here.

Then, yeah sign 2 offensive lineman and a LB.

That's the path. Some teams would take that path. I just don't know that the Bengals would.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Who else was conflicted during this game? - THE PISTONS - 12-09-2019, 02:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)