12-09-2019, 02:10 PM
(12-09-2019, 10:25 AM)TJHoushmandzadeh Wrote: This has been bugging me for a while but what does 1OA actually stand for - 1st overall? The A seems superfluous.
I'm less sanguine about next year's prospects but when I see a pessimist like yourself saying they may only need 6 players when they should be selecting at 1, 33 and 65 in the draft that should be three new starters - add in last year's 11th overall and that's four already and if they trade Dalton they could maybe pick up an extra starter (either player for player or for a draft pick) and then even a pessimist like yourself reckons we could be competitive with one further player and I'm forced to question whether I need to raise my expectations for next year.
How many quality starters did we get from this past draft?
Theoretically, picking at 1, 33, and 65 should be atleast 2 upgrades. But, I doubt that it is here.
Then, yeah sign 2 offensive lineman and a LB.
That's the path. Some teams would take that path. I just don't know that the Bengals would.
Check out the following blogs:
https://plackersinthewild.blogspot.com/
https://mygottareadbooks.blogspot.com/
http://questoffitness.blogspot.com/
Try Audible for 30 days and get 2 free Audio Books:
https://amzn.to/2WpeWc4
https://plackersinthewild.blogspot.com/
https://mygottareadbooks.blogspot.com/
http://questoffitness.blogspot.com/
Try Audible for 30 days and get 2 free Audio Books:
https://amzn.to/2WpeWc4