Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What changed in the running game
#39
(12-13-2019, 01:04 PM)Fullrock Wrote: If you don't think it's a positive that the staff was able to change the run blocking scheme DURING the season to completely turn around a historically bad first half of the season run game, then you're just being stubborn. I don't think anyone has said this staff has proven themselves to be good, but give credit where credit is due.

Also, the defense has seen a big improvement after the bye week. Anarumo and the defensive staff deserve some credit for that. It also helps when you can keep the other team's offense off the field with an effective running game.

There is plenty of criticism to go around on this coaching staff, which will always be the case on a football team that's 1-12, but refusal to acknowledge any positives is just silly. It wouldn't fit your agenda though. 


Exactly. I seem to remember something very similar happening 2 years ago with our run under Marvin, Zampese to Lazor, and Paul Alexander. That narrative won't fit in "Bash the coaches EVERY SINGLE THREAD Noise" that Jungle Noise has devolved into..... Whatever

"Better send those refunds..."

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
What changed in the running game - Au165 - 12-13-2019, 10:16 AM
RE: What changed in the running game - Wyche'sWarrior - 12-13-2019, 06:45 PM
RE: What changed in the running game - J24 - 12-13-2019, 02:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)