12-23-2019, 12:05 AM
I fear that Brown's thought process will be that because coaching consistency is positively correlated with winning, changing coaches is inherently bad. It's similar to if you were to input a string of data points into a computer that will be tasked with calling offensive plays based upon the data. The computer may fixate on a positive correlation between the amount of run plays being called and wins. The computer would keep calling runs, expecting a high probability of a win once 20+ run plays were called.
BB and Brady do not have a high winning percentage because they were retained for as long as they have been, but rather they have been retained for as long as they have been because of their high winning percentage. ZT may very well be a good or even a great HC someday, but it's looking like he needs an awful lot more experience if he's ever going to get there.
BB and Brady do not have a high winning percentage because they were retained for as long as they have been, but rather they have been retained for as long as they have been because of their high winning percentage. ZT may very well be a good or even a great HC someday, but it's looking like he needs an awful lot more experience if he's ever going to get there.
