01-23-2020, 12:07 PM
(01-23-2020, 10:35 AM)Sled21 Wrote: Correct. Just because our replacements for him did not work out, that doesn't mean they were wrong about not offering a long term contract to a lineman Whit's age. Whit has played longer at a high level than the vast majority of linemen. He's an outlier......
I see the reasoning here for sure, but A) he performed at an elite level for 2 years - worth the price of the contract; B) even at his diminished level he's performing at a quality level, much better than our current free agents (not to mention draft picks, which were a reach considering their risk factors). Add to that his intangibles as a leader and the fact that the FO once again gave the team a black eye by the way they handled this.
And C) The Rams knew what he was and were willing to pony up the money for his value. We did a very poor job of assessing his value and abilities. The Rams had a better handle on his status and he was not even playing in their building. Statistics and trends are important, but cannot be the only factor in their analysis.