Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Duke Tobin on why the Bengals didn't trade veteran players
#82
(01-23-2020, 02:39 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Yea, the logic is flawed.

1) A player like AJ Green is now a FA. There's no reason he couldn't have been traded for a draft pick mid-season and then come back to the Bengals as a FA. Was it worth not getting extra pick(s) for the sake of being able to negotiate with that person prior to the FA period?

2) Tobin's response is like someone who is thinking too short term. Is it worth more having that veteran "best" player for 1-2 years or getting draft pick(s) to develop a new core? If the intent/expectation is to compete for a Super Bowl this year or next year, you go with the veteran. If the team is nowhere close, you go the latter.

3) Like always, they are overvaluing their own guys. They need to realize that just because a guy they have might be good, they might be able to find someone better outside. Yes, there is risk involved, but you can't grow without taking risk.

Actually there are two reasons.  First, only in rare circumstances does a team make that trade without a new contract in place for the player.  Secondly, the new team can then tag the player.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Duke Tobin on why the Bengals didn't trade veteran players - jfkbengals - 01-26-2020, 01:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)