01-26-2020, 02:16 PM
(01-23-2020, 10:35 AM)Sled21 Wrote: Correct. Just because our replacements for him did not work out, that doesn't mean they were wrong about not offering a long term contract to a lineman Whit's age. Whit has played longer at a high level than the vast majority of linemen. He's an outlier......
Why is it the right move to tag an aging and often injured WR that played in 0 games the year before but it was wrong to tag an aging T coming off of an all pro year? That’s the head scratcher!
