01-28-2020, 04:16 PM
(01-28-2020, 04:00 PM)Catmandude123 Wrote: Lets put it in terms you might understand. You own a car and it is wrecked. The repairs are done but it has still not been driven since the repair. Then someone drives it and wrecks it again . Then you try again to sell it but it is still wrecked. In your scenario they both have the same value although on has been repaired and one is wrecked. Damaged goods are always worth less.
False equivalency.
Say I wreck my car and try to sell it to you. You say "Let me drive it so I know it is fixed". I say "No you can't drive it to see if it is fixed. I can't take the chance that you might wreck it."
You actually think you will get the same price for the car by refusing to let the buyer drive it as you would if you let him drive it?
This whole theory that Green was fine is just something fans made up in their heads. There are no facts to support. There is no logic to support it. Some fans just want to believe it so they pretend it is true.
