02-10-2020, 11:52 AM
(02-10-2020, 02:50 AM)Jpoore Wrote: Im more than happy to debate and prove my reasoning. Also I never changed the topic just addressed a different part of it.
Yes. Qb is the most important. But i prefer a less riskier option, in addition to building a team before grabbing the qb. Also yes 12 minimum starting positions. 4 oline 1 wr 2 dline 2 lbers 2 cbs 1 safety... as far as the qbs just off top of my head, Matthew stafford, can newton(outside of 1 great year), Phillip rivers, if I wasn’t at work could look up a whole lot more.. if burrow comes here I hope he does well. I hope hen is elite... but answer this. If the browns had drafted Lamar jackson instead of mayfield, would the browns Noel of rebuild be looked at as the standard? Probably. They built a team. Then went after the qb(just looks like the wrong one at this time).
Any QB taken lower in the draft is hardly a less riskier option, in fact, the lower you pick a QB, the more likely you are to miss on the guy.
And don't tell me that Jordan Love is a less riskier option and don't tell me that building a team first would be a better approach. It's simply not, unless you are planning to use free agency, which the Bengals never do.
