Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
FA's the Bengals should target.
#33
(03-22-2020, 05:15 PM)JerseyDD09 Wrote: I'm not complaining about the Dalton trade yet. I just comment about it in the Dalton post. You should check that out and get back to me. We don't know what's been happening behind the scenes with trade talks for Dalton. We on here may have been overestimating this entire time about Dalton's value. If any of the 32 teams really wanted Dalton, they could've probably got him for a 3rd rounder or trading a player to us for him. It wouldn't have been that difficult for a starting QB.
I'm still not on board with re-signing Vigil. He's one of the reasons people are so frustrated at the LB room over the last 4 years. Get rid of the problems and start fresh!
I'm definitely not against bringing on a Golden, Daryl Williams, or a Vonn Bell as well. Ogletree,Barron or Whitehead wouldn't be bad either for LB over Vigil IMO....

Heard that we would only take a 2nd rounder for Dalton. The Pats don't even have a 2nd round pick.

This was a mistake if we cannot get anything for Dalton.

The issue to me is that the team said they were going to try and make sure Dalton landed in a good place.

Just cutting him is not what they said they were going to do.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: FA's the Bengals should target. - McC - 03-17-2020, 10:28 PM
FA's the Bengals should target. - BenZoo2 - 03-18-2020, 10:15 AM
RE: FA's the Bengals should target. - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-22-2020, 05:45 PM
RE: FA's the Bengals should target. - McC - 03-22-2020, 07:26 PM
RE: FA's the Bengals should target. - McC - 03-22-2020, 08:46 PM
RE: FA's the Bengals should target. - McC - 03-25-2020, 03:18 PM
RE: FA's the Bengals should target. - McC - 03-27-2020, 06:17 PM
RE: FA's the Bengals should target. - McC - 03-27-2020, 06:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)