03-23-2020, 07:16 PM
(03-23-2020, 03:17 PM)JerseyDD09 Wrote: I saw the same issues as Nate.
Murray has dramatically better numbers than what Mack Wilson did. And, his measurables are much better.
Murray Combine---6'2", 240, 4.50 40yd, Vert-38"
Wilson Combine---6'1", 240, 4.71 40 yd, Vert-33"
Wilson had an up and down 1 year as a starter for Alabama.
Not much debate about Murray's season at OU. He had a great year.
I don't see Murray getting past the Bengals if he falls to them at #33. I think everyone on this board may jump at that point! Lmao! Or, how about if we were to pass him up at #65 and then the 4th???? OMG, people's heads would explode!
As weak as this year's LB class is, I'd honestly be surprised if Murray made it past 20.