10-16-2015, 08:29 AM
(10-16-2015, 08:17 AM)djs7685 Wrote: It's a very subjective term.
Like, I would consider a troll to be someone with over half of their post count being 1 liner responses that are extremely passive aggressive and condescending, which is "intent to inflame" in my eyes. Obviously you feel differently, right?
If starting an intentional Andy debate in an Andy thread is against the rules, then sue me, ban me, and make me walk the plank.
I also don't know how anybody could compare this to anything that mulligan would do, even remotely. He would bump about 15 threads at a time flipping out with the same argument, completely littering the boards with his insanity. I posted 1 video in 1 thread lol, c'mon guys, if you want to continue to bash me and throw me under the bus, at least let's start putting some thought into it!
Mr. WhoDeyWho, I firmly believe that you are the last person that should be calling someone a "troll" with your posting history. Thanks, and have a wonderful morning! I, for one, am over the back and forth with you, so if you'd like the last word, go for it.
When I go tell you to "suck somebody's dick" then perhaps I'd be willing to hear a lecture on "condescension" from you.
You were bored so you trolled. Let's just leave it at that.
