04-16-2020, 12:49 AM
(04-15-2020, 11:20 PM)Whatever Wrote: To be fair, every LB that could be there at 33 has significant warts. A lot of those can be deal breakers depending on your criteria.
For example, I like Murray's upside, but I can totally see why someone wouldn't want him at 33. Many think they will run more big nickel with 3 S's, which also makes LB less of a need.
I get that, but is the LB group so dire that we don’t have the luxury of going BPA at 33? I think at least some would say yes. We haven’t drafted a LB higher than the 3rd since Rey Maualuga over a decade ago. At some point we have to address it. I’d personally rather draft a LB high than be forced to overpay one in FA.