Would Gresham be doing the same thing Eifert is if he had this years' Andy?

[Shake n Blake]

(10-16-2015, 09:30 PM)djs7685 Wrote: 1. An entire thread full of Gresham trashing, like 3 total people sticking up for him by saying "he wasn't awful", and your conclusion is that we LOVE him? Are you trolling with that, or am I missing something?

2. I could say the same of the careers of some guys you've vehemently defended in the past.

3. Who are "Gresh homers"?? I honestly hope you aren't referring to those of us that have said he was solid in his time here.

Zero people have said anything even close to "omg Gresham was amazing!" Or even "he was great!" and you're puffing your chest as if you were right in our other argument because of this.

Honestly you're putting words in my mouth. Where did I say that any of you claimed Gresh is "amazing" etc? Many of the folks who vigorously defend him used to claim he was a top 10 TE, which he never was, imo. The main reason I think some of you are Gresh homers is because you go out of your way to downplay or ignore Gresh's faults. Sure, some were exaggerated, but the fumbles, penalties, well-documented moodiness and inconsistent route running were not.

If you refuse to acknowledge the obvious and undeniable flaws, then you look like a homer. As much as I've defended Dalton, I was always able to discuss his problems with INT's, the Browns, etc.

Btw, I noticed you skipped the part about why you guys would want a supposedly injured/ineffective TE. Kroft is doing what most backup TE's do. I think people are rushing to judge the dude, but I don't think the 2nd TE was ever going to have a big role in Hue's offense. In the words of Aaron Rodgers, I think people need to R-E-L-A-X. Kroft will be fine. 

A supposedly hobbled TE wouldn't have helped, and it would've kept Kroft from valuable snaps.