06-23-2020, 01:14 AM
(06-22-2020, 11:51 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Ok let me try to help you the best I can since you again don;t follow posts well
My comparison to the post was after 2 seasons for each... since Price has only played 2 seasons.
Season 1 for each: Can we just say a disaster for Ross.. Price started till he was hurt ( was not horrible as a rookie but not as expected either)
Season 2 for each: Outside of a 7 tds.. Ross was not very good ( 21 catches playing 60% of the snaps.. that is bad) .. Price did not recover well from injury lost his starting job at center to Hopson(who played the best on a bad line last year) and was not able to break lineup at guard so a disaster for Price
Look both have underperformed but you really do have blinders on or just bias in your love for Ross and potential if you say Ross was so much better than Price in each of their first 2 years...
You’re completely delusional if you think Price was “not horrible as a rookie.” Again, you must be watching different games. Maybe ones where he was in a Buckeyes uniform, which is probably why you’re sticking up so much for the kid. He sure as hell has never been anything but horrible in the NFL.
As for the bold, ofc Ross’ rookie season was a disaster. Our wise and all knowing HC sat him after a fumble, and he never saw the ball again that year. That’s not entirely on him.
But it’s odd to me you make excuses for Price based off injuries, but don’t give Ross the same benefit. One guy clearly has the talent to play in the NFL if he can stay healthy (big if), and the other guy looks like he doesn’t.
And as far as only comparing two years, that’s just stupid. Ross has been around for 3. You have to look at a players entire body of work. Ofc he doesn’t look as good when you take out his best season to date. No player would.