07-17-2020, 06:25 PM
(07-17-2020, 05:25 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Except he's finished 0 of those runs for TDs, which is what he and I were both talking about. It's not a statistical fluke when he's at 693 carries and 0 of them have been even 20+ yard TDs. That's a proper sample size.
Then answer this question.
Would you rather have a RB who had 2 runs of 20+ yards and one went for a td or a RB who had 11 runs of over 20 yards but none of them going for tds?
You are basically saying that the line of scrimmage where the play starts determines who is the better RB. That makes no sense at all to me. A RBs ability to break off long runs is based on how many long runs he has. Not how many of them went for tds.