07-30-2020, 11:54 AM
(07-30-2020, 11:15 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Sure you did. You stated Vigil was much better at shedding blocks because he had so many more tackles. When shown that point was incorrect you changed it to "Well one is better because he's on the field more". That's a classic example of moving the goalpost.
Vigil was better at shedding tackles and getting top the ball carrier. that was not proven to be false. An overwhelming majority of LB tackles come on running plays. Since Bynes only played on running downs he should have had A LOT more tackles per snap than Vigil, but the actual difference is so small the numbers are almost identical (.113 to .117)
(07-30-2020, 11:15 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Vigil was competing for snaps in a LB rotation that included the likes of Jordan Evans, Hardy Nickerson Jr, and nobodys. Bynes was competing for snaps in a 3-4 Defense that was top 4 in the NFL against folks such as Matt Judon, Jaylon Ferguson, Tyus Bowser.
Vigl and Bynes were competeing directly with each other on the free agent market and Vigil got paid more money.
I just can not understand the infatuation so many people around here have with Bynes. He is a career back up. The two times he has gotten a multi yaer contract he got cut before he could complete it. He got cut by the Cards in 2019 when he was under contract for less than $3 million. Last year he did not even make an NFL roster coming out of training camp. This has nothing to do with defending Vigil. This is just an honest evaluation of Bynes.
And people accuse me of defending "average at best" players?
