08-20-2020, 02:31 PM
(08-20-2020, 02:21 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: Thanks...more history lessons. I understand that Green has a better resume, but who gets the job done if healthy for 16 games? I think Ross provides more and that isn't a slight to Green. It is just acknowledging where he is as a player today.
And why does he have a better resume? Because he is a better WR over a longer period of time at the highest level of competition. Turf toe and ruptured ligaments aren’t age related injuries. So if they’re both out there for 16 games I’m gonna to pick the guy he has proven he can produce year after year rather than the WR that had two good games in 3 years versus back ups during garbage time.
