08-28-2020, 02:02 PM
(08-28-2020, 12:48 PM)Whatever Wrote: I'm not a Core fanboy, but he outproduced Tate in every statistical category in '18. Core wasn't good, but Tate was abysmal. Now, rookie WR usually take a year to adjust so I don't really hold that against Tate's future projection too much, but that's an inaccurate statement to say he was unfairly buried as a rookie. Sad thing is, Core still has a higher career catch % than Tate.Their was no.resson to.play Core over Tste. The Bengals were eliminated from the plsyoff race. Might as well see what you
As a point of comparison, Tate caught 4 of 12 targets for 35 yards as a rookie. Damion Willis caught 9 of 16 Targets for 82 yards last year and he was determined to not be good enough to make the roster this year. Anybody that thinks Tate should have gotten more PT as a rookie needs to put the Kool Aid away.
Have in your younger guys.
But nope Lewis stick with a WR with stone hands.