No Need for a #1 WR

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(09-27-2020, 11:05 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Different interpretations of the same thing then I guess.
We basically share the same info, but one of us considers it spreading whereas the other doesn't.
No receiver on the Bengals right now has more than 25% of the receptions.
Therefore, it means the QB is spreading the ball out to 4+ people.
Given there are only 5 offensive weapons on the field at a time, that's spreading to me.

But the problem with using the numbers this year is that they don't have a #1 WR right now. It's spread by requirement this year whereas last year with Burrow we can look at when he had a choice in the matter. You can't use stats where he has no choice and call it preference.

Lacking something doesn't mean that you prefer it that way is where I guess my problem on the idea arises....

Burrow has no #1 WR this year: It doesn't mean Burrow prefers to not have a #1 WR.
Burrow has a garbage OL this year: It doesn't mean Burrow prefers to have a garbage OL.