What do these players have in common?

[*ochocincos*]

(10-20-2020, 02:31 PM)Wyche Wrote: The bottom group is all Marvin era players, the others are young and hungry?

And being Marvin-era players, they are now playing for a HC who has been (much) worse than the one they are used to playing for.
They're essentially saying the problem isn't them, it's the coaching.

Think of it like any other company.
You go through a big organizational change and bring in some new leadership, who changes things up.
Some of the incumbents are there, but some new people are brought in too.
With the new model, performance has declined overall, including the incumbents.
The incumbents remember the days of old and felt they were more successful in that older model compared to this new model with this new leadership.
Is the problem the new leadership/model, the incumbents not able to adapt well to the new model, or a mix of both?