.
|
.
|
10-23-2020, 08:04 PM
(10-23-2020, 08:00 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: Have to remember that he is playing on the tag, and can't be extended until FA begins. There has got to be a reduction in compensation for what is most likely a short term rental before he walks for a top contract. Considering it's the Ravens who traded for him, I'd say it's more of a test drive than a pure rental. ![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png) Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations -Frank Booth 1/9/23 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - QueenCity - 10-23-2020, 06:14 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - jfkbengals - 10-23-2020, 07:02 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - leonardfan40 - 10-23-2020, 07:16 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - SunsetBengal - 10-23-2020, 07:55 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - jfkbengals - 10-23-2020, 08:00 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - SunsetBengal - 10-23-2020, 08:04 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - Fan_in_Kettering - 10-23-2020, 07:59 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - jfkbengals - 10-23-2020, 09:50 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - ochocincos - 10-23-2020, 10:54 PM
RE: Bengals “unreasonable” trade prices - TheLeonardLeap - 10-23-2020, 11:14 PM
|
