11-09-2020, 07:36 PM
(11-09-2020, 07:28 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If it is too small of a sample size to say he will be bad then it is also too small of a sample size to say he will be good.
Who's using his record as a statistic to say he will be good?
You're using a very specific statistic (W/L %) to paint your picture. I'm saying that it's too small of a sample size to use that specific statistic, not everything else.
I'm using a number of things, and namely my eyeballs, to say there's a good chance he will be a top 10 QB down the road. Just because I think it's too small a sample size for one thing doesn't mean I calling to dismiss everything else.
This is such a stupid debate to have anyways. I really don't know why I'm bothering to enter into the fray. Almost everyone agrees this kid has a fantastic start to his career. I'm not sure what anyone would go out of their way to try to diminish that.
And for the record, I never said anything initially about a Super Bowl, as I feel that's way more on the TEAM than any single player. But because you called everyone out I took the bait. I should've known better.
