Argument for and against Sewell.

[*rfaulk34*]

(11-29-2020, 06:54 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote:  So what you're saying is pick your guy and if he doesn't work out bengals fault..that makes a lot of sense.  Right now I would take Higgins over most 1st round receivers so have bengals sdo with that pick in the 2nd round.

I didn't say that anywhere. I said take the surest bet (knowing the Bengals track record--i don't trust them taking even 2 other guys that "could" be good). If he doesn't pan out, then it's either crappy coaching that couldn't teach him technique that he needed to get better or, he simply wasn't going to be good enough because of him. 

You have an unrealistic expectation of the Bengals picking a guy later in the draft that could be good and i want them to take the guy that gives them less chance of screwing the pick up. 

Re: Higgins; no one ever said they missed on every pick. They've just missed badly on 1st round guys that weren't top 5ish.

Billy Price
John Ross
WJIII (average)
Ogbuehi
Dennard
Kirkpatrick (average)

Quantity isn't always better than quality, especially when it's the Bengals picking.