Argument for and against Sewell.

[Jpoore]

(11-29-2020, 08:40 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: That’s like finding one person who ranks Fields ahead of Lawrence. The vast majority has Sewell as the best OL prospect in the draft.

Yes including me... but the smart play is still trading back. He’s not a consensus ol1, and ur banking the whole future on him being the best tackle in the game.

(11-29-2020, 02:38 PM)BenZoo2 Wrote: I’ll look for the article. And any comments he made regarding Sewell opting out this year. Let’s see if his rankings change prior to the draft


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah I found it on Twitter.

(11-29-2020, 08:34 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I didn't say that anywhere. I said take the surest bet (knowing the Bengals track record--i don't trust them taking even 2 other guys that "could" be good). If he doesn't pan out, then it's either crappy coaching that couldn't teach him technique that he needed to get better or, he simply wasn't going to be good enough because of him. 

You have an unrealistic expectation of the Bengals picking a guy later in the draft that could be good and i want them to take the guy that gives them less chance of screwing the pick up. 

Re: Higgins; no one ever said they missed on every pick. They've just missed badly on 1st round guys that weren't top 5ish.

Billy Price
John Ross
WJIII (average)
Ogbuehi
Dennard
Kirkpatrick (average)

Quantity isn't always better than quality, especially when it's the Bengals picking. 

Quality isn’t always better but in those drafts the perception was there weren’t very many elite guys. In this class? There is an absolute filthy amount of richer especially at the top. Especially at tackle and guard there is more top end talent this year than last year.