Argument for and against Sewell.

[Jpoore]

(11-29-2020, 09:59 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: I ain't buying it. A good percentage of those guy's aren't going to pan out. 

Sewell may not, but there's a much smaller chance that he won't. When you're that dominant and good at your job, it's rarely fools gold. And the kid is only 20. 

How can anyone look at a 20 year old, who's that good, and not know that he's going to turn out to be very good? If he does turn out bad, it would have to be because of some currently unseen circumstance, like he's lazy or not very coachable or something. 

And i'll say it for the millionth time...give the Bengals more picks and all you'll get is more chances for them to **** up. No thanks. Get me the top 5 talent and i'll take my chances. There isn't a damn thing anyone can say that will change my mind about how, if there's a way to screw up, the Bengals will find it. 

We draft Sewell we end up with 4-5 wins. We trade back we’re a serious playoff contender.

(11-29-2020, 11:12 PM)t3r3e3 Wrote: The NFL is a QB driven league. Franchise QB’s on rookie contracts are the most coveted team contracts out there. It’s easier to assemble a competitive roster with a cheap QB. You have to protect your QB to win. The Bengals need to quit dumpster diving with stooges like Hart, Redmond, Johnson, XSF, etc. and go after quality lineman. Sewell is the obvious choice.

No body saying dumpster diving. Getting 4 great players better than 1 elite players