Argument for and against Sewell.

[*rfaulk34*]

(12-01-2020, 06:17 PM)Whatever Wrote: I'd be ok with moving down in a couple of different scenarios. If someone offers a 2nd for us to move down to 5-6 I'd be good with it.  We could still get a top prospect like Parsons, Surtain, or Chase in that spot.  Otherwise, if we get the "whole draft this year plus picks next year" type deal, you take it.  I think where it's silly is if there's a guy in the 11-15 range you're in love with and are just trading back to justify drafting them.

A guy like Leatherwood in 2 makes sense because you can groom him behind Hart for a year.  Sewell is a great prospect, but I think many are overestimating just how much of an immediate upgrade he will be, if at all.  

How is a top 2 or 3 OA not an immediate upgrade?

I can see the other guys not being...but a top 2 or 3? C'mon man.