12-12-2020, 06:42 PM
(12-11-2020, 01:00 PM)kalibengal Wrote: see link on ZT and past bengals coaches....begs the question: If Bengals had the legit infrastructure in place (GM, scouts etc) would we
want " Zack Back" as that ROMAN ED commercial dad says.
If ML lands a new gig next yr and starts tearing it up thats going to be painful....
https://www.cincyjungle.com/2020/12/11/22167799/zac-taylor-coaching-tenure-bengals-front-office-ownership-mike-brown
Is it all ZT?
No, but 80% certainly is.
1. He selected his assistants, so everything they do is on him, 100%.
2. He's the HC, so player improvement, development, schemes, play calling, etc are 100% his.
3. He's the play caller who is very one dimensional, which is 100% on him.
4. There's the sucky front office effect, which he's been unable to overcome. Marvin did much better with this same front office. It's difficult to win with this front office, as evidenced by only one HC being able to win since Mike Brown inherited the team and named himself GM.
Bottom line is that ZT is pretty bad at the things he can control.
Marvin did better. A lot better. The difference is the coaching staff.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
