12-16-2020, 03:01 PM
(12-16-2020, 10:30 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: True. While I like that part of his MO, he doesn't seem to have the football IQ outside of designing some good routes that take too long to develop.
I think the game that frustrated me the most was the first Ravens game. He NEVER had a screen called once when they were blitzing every down. He let Burrow get killed and had no answer at all. If you aren't a good HC, at least be good at ONE THING, and I thought that was supposed to be offense.
I think Zac has reached a point, where as fans, it's not even worth analyzing such things anymore. "Why won't he call a screen?!?" type stuff is better saved for when there is an actual chance of winning. Zac has returned the Bengals to the 1990s where, as a fan, you're just waiting for the next Bungle moment.
His post game conferences are worse than typical coach-speak. He spews empty rhetoric and I wonder if he actually believes the positive spin he tries to thrust into his answers. Also, he's not one to usually have himself or his coaches take accountability for loss after loss. Yes, he recently said, "It's on me," but he usually is more apt to point out player mistakes. Zac is not what some think him to be, a leader. He's not a good leader and he's not a good coach. I'm older than Zac & he just strikes me as a young dude not prepared for his profession. He should still be a QB coach somewhere else.
Anyhow /endrant & you're right, he's not good at any one thing.