12-29-2020, 06:00 PM
(12-29-2020, 05:48 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: Picking 5th really opens up the BPA discussion doesn't it?
I don't think I could take a WR at 5 in this years class. There are way too many that could come in here and make a difference.
Now, people say we didn't use a TE all that much, but if you remember Burrow seemed to do a fair amount of damage with Uz when he was healthy. I don't know if I would want a TE at 5, but I think a legit threat at TE like Pitts would make a much larger impact than any WR we would take at that spot.
I think thats debatable. Pitts is a great player, but I dont really want to go off-topic and debate the positional value of WR vs TE at 5 lmao.
I will say this. The x factor for me is that Chase has proven success with Burrow and he was the best receiver in CFB last year.
When I look at players in the top 10 that I feel can be annually all pro players, It comes down to Parsons and Sewell.
_____________________________________________________________________